Basic Attribute Type Should Not Be A Container

Basic Attribute Type Should Not Be A Container. 10 Common Type of Shipping Containers What You Need to Know Easyvessel The use of @Basic annotation when declaring a List or collection type This is the entity that displays the issue: @Entity public class InsuranceSelectionForm { @Id @GeneratedValue(strategy = GenerationType.IDENTITY) private Long id; @ManyToOne private List insuranceCompanyDisplayOrder; @OneToOne private.

CSCS 213 DATABASE SYSTEMS. ppt download
CSCS 213 DATABASE SYSTEMS. ppt download from slideplayer.com

The @Basic annotation has two attributes, optional and fetch The warning about it should not be container appears on the field annotated with @ManyToOne

CSCS 213 DATABASE SYSTEMS. ppt download

For example, using @Basic instead of @ElementCollection It says 'Basic' attribute type should not be a container By adhering to JPA conventions and leveraging associations for entity relationships, you can overcome the limitation of declaring container types like List directly within @Entity classes marked as 'Basic' attributes

10 Common Type of Shipping Containers What You Need to Know Easyvessel. This approach ensures proper entity mapping and facilitates efficient data retrieval and manipulation within your Java. Problem; Since I use Spring Data JPA in my SpringBoot project, the framework will use the property List as a field of the database, not the data type of MySQL;

Types of Attributes in DBMS Scaler Topics. Some JPA implementations may support conversion between many different data-types or additional types, or have extended type conversion support, see the advanced section for more details. The @Basic annotation has two attributes, optional and fetch